Central to the dispute is the proper interpretation of sections 66 and 68 of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA).  At the heart of the dispute is the ambit of these sections and the interplay between them and some of the other sections in the PFMA.

This matter concerns the proper interpretation of certain provisions of the National Credit Act (the Act).[1] More specifically, the question raised is whether s 90(2)(n) and s124 of the Act render the common-law right of set-off inapplicable in respect of credit agreements that are subject to the Act

High Court finds in favour of an RAF claimant who was left without support after her partner, to whom she was not married but with whom she shared reciprocal duties of support, died in a fatal car accident. Jacobs v Road Accident Fund